Using the USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) cable to connect laptop to ThinkPad USB-C Dock Gen 2 and then from the Docking station to connect through as well a USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) to a monitor that supports 120Hz.īy doing so, theoretically can one surpass the problem of the 1.4 HDMI limitation of data transfer mentioned above. Windows 10, version 1809 and later, Servicing Drivers, Windows 10, version 1809 and later, Upgrade & Servicing Drivers. I'm thinking about the following scenario: Die Intel UHD Graphics der Comet-Lake-Generation kann keine relevanten Vorteile gegenüber der Intel UHD Graphics 620 vorweisen. Running on a laptop: Lenovo ThinkPad T590 - with UHD Graphics 620, connected then to a: ThinkPad USB-C Dock Gen 2 and then connecting a monitor with say 120Hz capability.
Now my question from a different angle, is: what about the following scenario: "1080o 120 or 144Hz need a bandwidth of 7.46 Gbps or 8.96 Gbps respectively, so the bandwidth via HDMI is not enough. " he meant here the 1.4 HDMI This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is. The reason I`m asking this again after reading Sebastian's answer from the link above, is, that he was stating: Price and performance details for the Intel UHD Graphics 620 can be found below. Could you please help out with the answer for the question from the topic title?Ī similar question was asked & Sebastian answered here, but I`m asking from a bit of a different angle.Ĭ/t5/Graphics/%C4%B0ntel-Hd-Graphics-620-120hz/m-p/1242212#M92978
0 kommentar(er)
